http://coursematerials.net/emh201/unit5_scenario/index.html#/ Overview:  As you learned in the CPG 201 document, Step 2 of the THIRA process involves the

Overview: 

As you learned in the CPG 201 document, Step 2 of the THIRA process involves the further development of risks previously identified (in Step 1) by providing context descriptions. 

• Context descriptions are details provided for each risk based on time, location, and magnitude used to estimate the impacts of each risk. Context descriptions provide decision-makers with a deeper understanding of the risks previously identified in Step 1.

 Instructions: 

To complete Step 2 of the THIRA process, you will need to fill in the missing information associated with each of the risk items (remember, there were 20 risk items previously reported from Step 1 of the THIRA, so you will review the same risk items for Step 2). Review the train derailment scenario again and fill in the missing information in the worksheet. 

• Context descriptions are provided, and you will be required to complete the entry by entering information related to time, location, and magnitude. 

• Keep in mind that there are many correct answers for some of the times, locations, and magnitudes for the risk items. Therefore, use your best judgment to provide an accurate or appropriate time, location, or magnitude for the risk items. 

Requirements: 

• Context descriptions 

o Fill in the missing information for the 10 risk items that are incomplete. 10 points for each correct answer, with a total possible score of 100 points earned. 

o Some of the risk items have been completed for you to give you a working idea of how to choose an appropriate time, location, or magnitude.

Please See Attach File For Worksheet!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Sample Checklist #1 Student Engagement Observation Checklist References Cassar, A. G., & Jang, E. E. (2010). Investigating the effects of a

Sample Checklist #1 Student Engagement Observation Checklist References Cassar, A. G., & Jang, E. E. (2010). Investigating the effects of a game-based approach in teaching word recognition and spelling to students with reading disabilities and Attention deficits. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15(2), 193–211. Sample Checklist #2 References Koth, C.

INTRODUCTION An organization’s sustainable competitive advantage is derived largely from intangible assets: human, social, and intellectual capital. Human

INTRODUCTION An organization’s sustainable competitive advantage is derived largely from intangible assets: human, social, and intellectual capital. Human resource professionals enable current and future organizational competitiveness by ensuring that people with the skills, knowledge, and abilities needed to produce these resources are in adequate supply. This is accomplished through employee